Thursday, April 30, 2015

Robots 101: Lasers - Robohub

mapping

By Ilia Baranov


In this new Robots 101 series, we will be taking a look at how robots work, what makes designing them challenging, and how engineers at Clearpath Robotics tackle these problems. To successfully operate in the real world, robots need to be able to see obstacles around them, and locate themselves. Humans do this mostly through sight, whereas robots can use any number of sensors. Today we will be looking at lasers, and how they contribute to robotic systems.

the-day-the-earth-stood-still-gort3


Overview

When you think of robots and lasers, the first image that comes to mind might come from science fiction; robots using laser weapons. However, almost all robots today use lasers for remote sensing. This means that the robot is able to tell, from a distance, some characteristics of an object. This can include size, reflective, color, etc. When the laser is used to measure distance in an arc around the robot, it is called LIDAR. LIDAR is a portmanteau of Light and Radar, essentially think of a sweeping radar beam shown in the films, using light.

Function and Concepts


By Mike1024, via Wikimedia Commons

All LIDAR units operate using this basic set of steps:

1. Laser light is emitted from the unit (usually infrared)

2. Laser light hits an object and is scattered

3. Some of the light makes it back to the emitter

4. The emitter measures the distance (more on how later)

5. Emitter turns, and process begins again

The animation provides a great visual depiction of that process.


Animation of LIDAR operation process



Types of LIDAR sensing


How exactly the laser sensor measures the distance to an object depends on how accurate the data needs to be. Three different methods commonly found on LIDAR sensors are:

Time of flight

The laser is emitted, and then received. The time difference is measured, and distance is simply (speed of light) x (time). This approach is very accurate, but also expensive due to the extremely high precision clocks needed on the sensor. Thus, it is usually only used on larger systems, and at longer ranges. Rare to use on robots



Phase difference


In this method, the emitted laser beam is modulated to a specific frequency. By comparing the phase shift of the returned signal on a few different frequencies, the distance is calculated. This is the most common way laser measurement is done. However, it tends to have limited range, and is less accurate than time of flight. Almost all of our robots use this.

Untitled-140x300Angle of incidence

The cheapest and easiest way to do laser range-finding is by angle of incidence. Essentially, by knowing what angle the reflected laser light hits the sensor, we can estimate the distance. However, this method tends to be of low quality. The Neato line of robotic vacuum cleaners use this technology.

Another thing to note is that so far, we have only discussed 2D LIDAR sensors. This means they are able to see a planar slice of the world around them, but not above or below. This has limitations, as the robot is then unable to see obstacles lower or higher than that 2d plane. To fix this issue, either multiple laser sensors can be used, or the laser sensor can be rotated or “nodded” up and down to take multiple scans. The first solution is what the Velodyne line of 3D LIDAR sensors employ, while the second solution tends to be a hack done by roboticists. The issue with nodding a LIDAR unit is a drastic reduction of refresh rate, from tens of Hz, down to 1 Hz or less.

Manufacturers and Uses


Some of the manufacturers we tend to use are SICK, Hokuyo, and Velodyne.

This is by no means an exhaustive list, just the ones we use most often.

SICK

Most of our LIDARs are made by SICK. Good combo of price, size, rugged build, and software support. Based in Germany

Hokuyo

Generally considered cheaper than SICK, in larger quantities. Some issues with fragility, and software support is not great. Based in Japan

Velodyne

Most expensive, used only when robot MUST see everything in the environment. Based in US.

Once the data is collected, it can be used for a variety of reasons. For robots, these tend to be:

  • Mapping
    • Use the laser data to find out dimensions and locations of obstacles and rooms. This allows the robot to find its position (localisation) and also report dimensions of objects. The title image of this article shows the Clearpath Robotics Jackal mapping a room.

  • Survey
    • Similar to mapping, however this tends to be outside. The robot collects long range data on geological formations, lakes, etc. This data can then be used to create accurate maps, or plan out mining operations.

  • Obstacle Avoidance
    • Once an area is mapped, the robot can navigate autonomously around it. However, obstacles that were not mapped (for example, squishy, movable humans) need to be avoided.

  • Safety Sensors
    • In cases where the robot is very fast or heavy, the sensors can be configured to automatically cut out motor power if the robot gets too close to people. Usually, this is a completely hardware-based feature.

Selection Criteria


A lot of criteria is used to select the best sensor for a given application. The saying goes that an engineer is someone who can do for $1 what any fool can do for $2. Selecting the right sensor for the job not only reduces cost, but also ensures that the robot has the most flexible and useful data collection system.

  • Range
    • How far can laser sensor see? This impacts how fast a robot is able to move, and how well it is able to plan.

  • Light Sensitivity
    • Can the laser work properly outdoors in full sunlight? Can it work with other lasers shining at it?

  • Angular Resolution
    • What is the resolution of the sensor? More angular resolution means more chances of seeing small objects.

  • Field of view
    • What is the field of view? A greater field of view provides more data.

  • Refresh rate
    • How long does it take the sensor to return to the same point? The faster the sensor is, the faster the robot can safely move.

  • Accuracy
    • How much noise is in the readings? How much does it change due to different materials?

  • Size
    • Physical dimensions, but also mounting hardware, connectors, etc

  • Cost
    • What fits the budget?

  • Communication
    • USB? Ethernet? Proprietary communication?

  • Power
    • What voltage and current is needed to make it work?

  • Mechanical (strength, IP rating)
    • Where is the sensor going to work? Outdoors? In a machine shop?

  • Safety
    • E-stops

    • regulation requirements

    • software vs. hardware safety
For example, here is a collected spec sheet of the SICK TIM551.
 Range (m)
 0.05 – 10 (8 with reflectivity below 10%)
 Field of View (degrees)
 270
 Angular Resolution (degrees)
 1
 Scanning Speed (Hz)
15 
 Range Accuracy (mm)
 ±60
 Spot Diameter (mm)
 220 at 10m
 Wavelength (nm)
 850
 Voltage (V)
 10 – 28
 Power (W) (nominal/max)
 3
 Weight (lb/kg)
 0.55/0.25
 Durability (poor) 1 – 5 (great)
 4 (It is IP67, metal casing)
 Output Interface
 Ethernet, USB (non-IP67)
 Cost (USD)
 ~2,000
 Light sensitivity
 This sensor can only be used indoors.
 Other
 Can synchronize for multiple sensors.Connector mount rotates nicely.



If you liked this article, you may also be interested in:

See all the latest robotics news on Robohub, or sign up for our weekly newsletter.





Robots 101: Lasers - Robohub

Sensors Key to Preserving Battlefield Edge - Armed with Science

Science and technology programs involving sensors and other capabilities are on the rise. The reason for that support is that sensors are relatively inexpensive when compared to the big weapons systems they protect, plus, they provide protection for soldiers.


Dr. Mike Grove, principal deputy for Technology and Countermine, Army Communications-Electronics Research, Development & Engineering Center, Night Vision and Electronic Sensors Directorate, speaks to industry representatives during a National Defense Industrial Association-sponsored Sensors Community of Interest seminar in Springfield, Va., March 25, 2015. (Photo: David Vergun/Released)

Dr. Mike Grove, principal deputy for Technology and Countermine, Army Communications-Electronics Research, Development & Engineering Center, Night Vision and Electronic Sensors Directorate, speaks to industry representatives during a National Defense Industrial Association-sponsored Sensors Community of Interest seminar in Springfield, Va., March 25, 2015. (Photo: David Vergun/Released)



Dr. Mike Grove, principal deputy for Technology and Countermine, Army Communications-Electronics Research, Development and Engineering Center, Night Vision and Electronic Sensors Directorate, focused on the need for improved sensors during a speech at the National Defense Industrial Association-sponsored Sensors Community of Interest seminar in Springfield, Virginia, March 25.


While military sensors are inexpensive in the big scheme of modernization, they are actually quite expensive compared to sensors used in the civilian sector because military sensors must be extremely light, rugged and powerful, Grove said. It would seem convenient and logical to simply repurpose commercial sensors, but military sensors are very specialized in battlefield surveillance and target acquisition, two broad focus areas of Grove’s Sensors Community of Interest, or CoI.


GRUNT-PROOF SENSORS


Sensors used by the Army and Marine Corps are among the hardest to develop, Grove said, because they become part of the soldiers’ load. Soldiers slog through mud and snow and their equipment takes a beating. That means miniaturization, lightweight materials and use of an efficient power source are prime considerations for soldiers, as well as the small, unmanned aerial systems they carry to the battlefield.


Sensors for the Air Force and Navy, by contrast, are a lot easier to develop because there is a lot more room in ships and aircraft to place them and the weight requirements for sensors is negligible compared with the added load for a dismounted soldier, he said.


PACIFIC PATHWAYS SENSORS


The Pacific region in particular calls for a special category of “wide-area persistent surveillance” sensors, both active as well as passive that can overcome what Grove called the clutter of dense jungle interspersed with cities which are fast becoming urban-jungle megacities.


Ideal sensors for those areas would allow soldiers long-range standoff sensory capabilities. That means those sensors would need to be especially powerful. One idea that offers possibilities is emplacing passive sensors on the ocean floor and awakening them when needed, thereby conserving their power supply.


The Navy is now using facial recognition sensors that can identify persons 100 meters away. They are using those sensors to see who is coming aboard their ships, but if the distance could be increased, soldiers could use them to identify friend from foe, Grove added.


To see through dense foliage, Sensor CoI is exploring the use of Laser Illuminated Detection and Ranging, LADAR, technologies. Simply put, LADAR creates 3D-image pictures using laser range-finding sensors. Powerful algorithms are used to merge many images and separate the signal from the noise, with the signal being “focuses of interest” and noise being jungle clutter.


SENSOR WARS


Adversaries in the future are likely to acquire their own sensors, Grove said, which could in turn lead to counter-sensors, counter-counter sensors and so on. That could escalate the cost for producing new classes of sensors.


The Sensor CoI approach is to look at developing inexpensive, disposable sensors that can be programmed to do a specific task or several tasks and then be turned off or self-destruct to avoid the chance of them or their data being intercepted, as in an urban environment. Such sensors already exist which can detect noxious gases.


Sensors will continue to proliferate and the military will increasingly find ways to use them, as will potential adversaries, Grove said. There are many promising lines of research, including leveraging biomedical imaging sensors, which are now being used in the civilian world.


ABOUT SENSOR COI


The Sensor CoI is divided into three working groups: electro-optical and infrared; acoustic, seismic and magnetic; and radio frequency (radar).


There are 17 communities of interest throughout the Department of Defense. In addition to the sensor community, there are counter-weapons of mass destruction, autonomy, space, human systems, electronic warfare, air platforms, cyber, ground and sea platforms, energy and power, advanced electronics technologies, materials and manufacturing processes, weapons technologies, C4I, counter-improvised explosive devices, engineered resilient systems and biomedical.


Grove said his community concentrates solely on battlefield surveillance and target acquisition sensors. However, the various communities collaborate and share knowledge on sensors and other overlapping interests so duplication of effort is minimized.


Story and information provided by the U.S. Army

Follow Armed with Science on Facebook and Twitter!

———-


Disclaimer: The appearance of hyperlinks does not constitute endorsement by the Department of Defense. For other than authorized activities, such as, military exchanges and Morale, Welfare and Recreation sites, the Department of Defense does not exercise any editorial control over the information you may find at these locations. Such links are provided consistent with the stated purpose of this DoD website.



Sensors Key to Preserving Battlefield Edge - Armed with Science

Industrial Automation Equipment (IAE) market growth in 2015 despite headwinds - Ferret

A research note by Alex Chausovsky, senior principal analyst for industrial automation at IHS Technology, indicates market growth for industrial automation equipment in 2015 despite setbacks in the economy.


The global oil and gas industry has been going through some difficult times with oil prices having fallen by approximately 50% since the summer of 2014, and affecting everything from investment and jobs to gasoline prices and consumer consumption.


Significant reductions in capital expenditure ranging from 10% to 40%, announced by the world’s largest oil and gas companies for 2015 are a matter of concern for companies in the industrial automation space. Though these cutbacks are expected to impact growth this year, Alex Chausovsky believes the situation is not so bad.


The Industrial Automation Equipment (IAE) market will continue to grow in 2015 despite facing some resistance in the form of low oil and commodity prices and weakened demand from some developing economies. Overall market revenue growth will be dampened by approximately 1%-2% this year.


Improving global economic growth, particularly in the United States, European Union (EU), Japan and India, will continue to support growing sales of IAE products in 2015. Although slowing growth in China and recessions in Brazil and Russia will limit this expansion, it won’t be enough to counterweigh the improving conditions in the other regions.


Sales growth in the IAE segment will be impacted by the significantly decreased capital investment in the oil and gas and other commodity-related sectors in 2015 and 2016; however, this decline will be offset by growth in other industries such as automotive, food and beverage, packaging, materials handling and robotics.


Of the three major IAE product groups, motors and motor controls will be most hurt by low oil prices as sales into the oil and gas sector comprised nearly 8% of the total revenues for these product categories in 2014. Automation equipment will not be affected as much, with the exception of process controllers, which derived nearly 25% of their 2014 revenues from oil and gas. Power transmission products will be the least disturbed of the lot while hydraulic systems, which is quite reliant on oil & gas industry sales, faces significant declines in 2015.


Overall, the IAE market will continue growing in 2015, with revenue expansion expected to come in at 4.5% over 2014 levels. Oil price recovery, which is widely expected to occur by late 2015, will brighten the outlook for industrial automation suppliers.



Industrial Automation Equipment (IAE) market growth in 2015 despite headwinds - Ferret